Nokia 3220 review from United Kingdom
"Good"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
On/off button broke when pushed once.
Back cover does not fit properly.
General comments?
Very easy to use.
The camera is good, but could be better.
Quite expensive for the money.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Reception marks | 9/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 8/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 9/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 7/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 5 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 2 |
| Previous mobile phone | Nokia 3210 |
| Date of Entry | 2nd October, 2005 |