Pantech TX130c review from New Zealand
"Good phone, nice price, but don't have too high expectations"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
Screen is easily marked.
Camera isn't 1.3 megapixel quality as specified by the manufacturer.
Weak vibration.
General comments?
Good phone, needs some work done before I'd fully recommend it.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Reception marks | 9/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 6/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 6/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 10/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 3/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 5/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 3 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 2 |
| Previous mobile phone | Nokia 3205 |
| Date of Entry | 9th October, 2005 |