Nokia 6210 review from United Kingdom
"Unspectacular, but very, very reliable"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
Nothing - it's worked flawlessly for 4 years...
General comments?
The unit is nothing special; nice to look at, but far from spectacular.
The monochrome LCD screen is as clear as any and the functions are the bog-basic Nokia fare.
The best thing I've noticed about this device is that it fits comfortably into the pocket in spite of it being far from small, and it appears to be relatively indestructable compared to other devices I've used (and destroyed!).
I now own a Treo600 (hopefully soon to be upgraded to a 650) but have no intention of getting rid of the 6210 - it is so utterly reliable that I will probably have it around as a spare for many years to come...
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2001 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Reception marks | 9/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 8/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 3/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 9/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 10/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 4 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 3 |
| Previous mobile phone | NEC DB1000 |
| Date of Entry | 12th March, 2005 |