Nokia 3105 review from Australia
"Basic, but brilliant"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
No faults over nearly 2 years of regular use.
General comments?
Great CDMA phone. Very basic - but does the job well.
Aftermarket covers are clearly inferior to the Nokia items.
Extremely easy to use - if I could, I'd have it back!
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Reception marks | 8/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 6/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 9/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 10/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 8/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 7 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 3 |
| Previous mobile phone | Nokia 5110 |
| Date of Entry | 6th April, 2006 |