Motorola RAZR V3 review from United States of America
"Good quality basic phone, fairly easy to use"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
One dropped call in a year of ownership and heavy use.
General comments?
Great phone, if you are just looking for a good quality (sound, build, usability) phone. But definetely lacking smartphone functionality. I mean if this phone came with Windows Mobile, I would have paid at least twice as much as I did for this one.
Another thing to notice is that reception and reliability of this phone is highly dependent on your service provider. Mine is Cingular - horrible customer service, but very good reception on the phone. The T-Mobile version does not seem to work as well as mine.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Reception marks | 9/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 9/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 8/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 7/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 8/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 4 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 3 |
| Previous mobile phone | Motorola MPx220 |
| Date of Entry | 6th April, 2006 |