Nokia 6020 review from Lithuania
"Definitely not worth its price"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
Three days after buying this piece of plastic, I had to take it to the local service centre because the gallery disappeared with all its contents.
General comments?
The phone is quite easy to use, as with all Nokias.
The camera is very low-quality and the ring-tones (as for all Nokias) sound quite good.
The build of it... oh, always a lot of dust under the cover in the screen area.
The screen could actually be quite bigger than it is. Instead of that - lots of plastic and unused space.
THe internal memory only 2 MB or something like that, including 1.5 MB that is used for software and the built-in gallery. If you want to make a not so poor quality picture, the quality level must be set to the highest, and this means the photo will "weigh" about 70-80 KB. So several photos in the gallery, and the memory is full... To say nothing about video...
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Reception marks | 3/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 1/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 9/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 5/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 1/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 8 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 2 |
| Previous mobile phone | Siemens M55 |
| Date of Entry | 7th April, 2006 |