Motorola V400p review from France
"A good balance between quality and price"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
Nothing.
General comments?
This phone has a very nice screen, a great battery life, but the quality of the camera is very poor (it is just a gadget), and as usual with Motorola phones, the interface is not always intuitive.
Push-to-talk function is useless because it's not available with many operators.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Reception marks | 10/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 9/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 6/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 9/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 2/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 7 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 2 |
| Previous mobile phone | Motorola T720 |
| Date of Entry | 6th April, 2005 |