Motorola RAZR V3 review from United Kingdom
"Style at the expense of function"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
Messaging is a nightmare: Illogical and obstructive predictive text. Keypad is too vague and fiddly to enable quick or comfortable texting.
Link to PC: works intermittently. Software is not fully compatible with Windows XP, which is ridiculous.
General comments?
Works well as a TELEPHONE. All other functions are average at best.
Extremely ergonomic when used to talk.
Looks fantastic and is comfortable to carry in pocket.
External case and keypad are cutting edge. Software and multi-media features are derisively poor and out of date.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | No |
| First year of ownership | 2005 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2006 |
| Reception marks | 5/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 6/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 5/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 5/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 2/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 8 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 3 |
| Previous mobile phone | Samsung E900 |
| Date of Entry | 20th December, 2006 |