Motorola C139 review from United States of America
"Great entry level phone"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
So far nothing has gone wrong with this phone.
General comments?
Reception got a 5 partially due to the fact I live in a pit, but the antenna is built in so reception suffers a little.
Voice quality is pretty good.
Build quality is great. I dropped it a few times resulting with a good slam each time and no side effects have come about.
Screen resolution is poor, but this is a cheap entry level phone.
Ease of use is decent. The menu system can be annoying at times.
Vibration is decent enough to know when someone's calling you.
No camera, again, entry level phone.
Battery life is excellent. Charge this one up and it would be quicker to watch paint dry than to watch the battery run out.
Charge time seems to take about 2, maybe 3 hours at the very most.
Recommended Reviews:
 | Reliable and cheap, though basic |
 | Good phone for the basic user, bad for the advanced user |
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2006 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2007 |
| Reception marks | 5/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 8/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 3/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 5/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 6/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 0/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 14 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 3 |
| Date of Entry | 18th March, 2007 |