Nokia 3595 review from United States of America
"Great for durability, but not for looks"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
The little rubber thing on the back fell off weeks after I bought it.
General comments?
The phone's original cover is really strong. I have dropped it down stairs and thrown it at the wall. The cover split apart. When I put it back together, it turned back on and it didn't have a scratch on it.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2004 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Reception marks | 7/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 8/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 6/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 6/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 3 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 2 |
| Previous mobile phone | Nokia 3595 |
| Date of Entry | 3rd May, 2005 |