Samsung D900 review from New Zealand
"Good phone, but could have been better for the money"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
The screen has cracked after being sat on.
General comments?
Slimmer shape than my previous D800 and E250, which makes it a bit less robust. The D900i has almost the same software as the E250, so wasn't as good as I thought it would be; I was hoping it would be on par or better than my older D800.
It's easier to use the microSD card than the E250, and the screen resolution and camera is miles better too.
It has a good variety of themes, but it's still hard to use custom ringtones and custom message alert tones.
Recommended Reviews:
 | Worthless piece of junk |
 | It could be the best if the menu was as user friendly as other brands |
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Don't Know |
| First year of ownership | 2007 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2008 |
| Reception marks | 7/10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 9/10 |
| Build Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 10/10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 7/10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 9/10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 7/10 |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 2 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 4 |
| Previous mobile phone | Samsung E250 |
| Date of Entry | 15th January, 2008 |