Nokia N96 review from United Kingdom
"Good unless you are in weak signal area"
What things have gone wrong with the mobile phone?
Casing and buttons wear easily.
Software crashes all the time or freezes.
Reception is generally bad.
General comments?
Easy to use as with all Nokias.
Loads of storage space, decent music player, quality camera.
Battery life is good considering what it does.
Stopped using it now though, as I need to have a signal as my mobile is used for business, so I'm using a 4 year old 6230i so I can be reached.
| Would you buy another mobile phone from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| First year of ownership | 2008 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2009 |
| Reception marks | 6 / 10 |
| Voice Quality marks | 9 / 10 |
| Build Quality marks | 8 / 10 |
| Screen Quality marks | 9 / 10 |
| Ease of Use marks | 7 / 10 |
| Vibration Strength marks | 8 / 10 |
| Camera Quality marks | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Approximate Battery Life in days (no calls made or received) | 2 |
| Approximate time to charge the battery (from flat) in hours | 2 |
| Previous mobile phone | Nokia N95 |
| Date of Entry | 28th May, 2009 |